Governor blasts GOP budget and stimulus plans

By MOLLY PRIDDY
Community News Service
UM School of Journalism

HELENA – As bills to spend billions of state and federal tax dollars work their way through Legislature’s final days, Gov. Brian Schweitzer is making it clear that he’s not pleased with what he sees heading his way.

“This session, if it ended today, would be less successful than the last legislative session,” Schweitzer said in an interview this week. “The major funding bills are not anywhere close to a condition where we could support them.”

The governor is especially miffed with Senate Republicans who reduced funding for a voter-approved program to expand health coverage for another 30,000 uninsured Montana children. Their plan would add cover about 15,000 additional children. Nor is he happy with the GOP plan to spend less ongoing state money on K-12 schools.

But if you really want to set him off, ask him what he thinks of GOP’s plan to dole out nearly $800 million in federal stimulus dollars provided in the Obama administration’s Recovery Act.

“The money that is contained in (that bill), violates the principal of the Recovery Act, and we would run a very high risk of being forced to send the money back to Washington, D.C.,” Schweitzer said. “There is an inadequate investment in education and health care.”

Senate Republicans fired back, saying the criticism comes from an absent governor who did not offer suggestions about how to solve problems earlier in the session. They also said their amendments to the bill fund both health care and education responsibly, given the recession.

“Education is funded at the level he funded it at in his budget,” said Senate President Bob Story, R-Park City.

That’s technically true, but the clash over of how Democrats and Republicans want to fund schools has implications for the future.

Schweitzer’s proposed budget would give school districts a 3 percent increase in ongoing state money for their base budgets and 3 percent increase for per student payments. That money would be a permanent increase, unless some future Legislature votes to cut it.

But Senate Republicans fear that if the economy doesn’t improve and state tax coffers shrink over the next two years, lawmakers could be forced to either slash school funding or raise taxes, something neither party wants to do.

The GOP solution is to give school districts the same amount as the governor proposed but with one important difference: The bulk of it would come from one-time federal stimulus money – money that won’t be there in two years.

That means that if the economy doesn’t improve, schools had better start looking for ways to cut their budgets. Senate Majority Leader Jim Peterson, R-Buffalo, said the GOP plan gives schools time to consider changes, if necessary.

“We’re not underfunding education,” Peterson said. “The only debated issue is where should the base (increases) be two years from now.”

Another simmering feud between Schweitzer and GOP leaders is over the doling out federal stimulus dollars to cities and counties for “shovel-ready” infrastructure projects, such as road and bridge work.

The governor wants legislation that spells out each single project. Senate Republican want to give local governments block grants so they can decide how to best spend the money.

Story said the change was made to protect the money so Schweitzer could not pick and choose which project to veto when it’s time to sign the stimulus bill.

That’s “ridiculous,” Schweitzer said during Wednesday’s interview. To make his point, he produced a 60-plus page copy of the main budget bill, tossed it on the table and began pointing out various line items and their costs. That system allows for transparency, Schweitzer said.

“This is the way we appropriate money in Montana,” Schweitzer said. “The Recovery Act is not going to allow states to just shovel money out of a window in the dark of night and I, as the governor who signed the letter accepting responsible for these recovery dollars, will not sign such a bill.”

As one of the few states in the country not facing billions in deficits, Schweitzer said mistreatment of federal dollars could put Montana’s relatively sound economy at risk.

“I’m not going to allow a few members of the Legislature to put Montana in a difficult situation,” he said.

But Peterson and Story said the governor is wrong in his concern about transparency. Any city or county applying for the money would have to go through the Department of Commerce, Peterson said, a function of the governor’s office.

“This is a better way,” Peterson said. “You can see that it’s even more transparent.”

Budget matters aren’t the governor’s only concerns as the Legislature heads down the homestretch. He’s also frustrated with Republicans who blocked his bill to set govern “carbon sequestration,” a fledgling technology to capture and store underground the carbon dioxide emitted by coal-fired power plants.

Republican Sen. Keith Bales, R-Otter, drew Schweitzer’s anger after Bales sponsored the GOP version of a carbon sequestration bill. Both bills were tabled amid partisan differences centering on who would authorize permits and the state’s ultimate liability for any environmental damage the process might cause.

“He couldn’t answer questions about his own bill,” Schweitzer said of Bales.

The governor accused Republicans of purposefully bringing forward a bad sequestration bill, knowing full well it would die but earning credit for proposing it.

“These are the same cats that voted against the ‘clean and green’ tax policy that we had in the last legislative session that’s already brought about $1 billion worth of investment to Montana,” Schweitzer said.

Peterson disagreed with Schweitzer’s assessment of the sequestration bill.

“There’s nothing wrong with that bill,” Peterson said. “Sen. Bales worked hard on that bill.”

Peterson said the governor’s criticism stems from partisan differences, not content.

“In my mind, it’s all politics,” Peterson said. “The governor needs to govern with a window, not just with a mirror.”

Schweitzer did have some plaudits for Republicans who insisted, as he does, that the budget include a $250 million contingency or “rain day” fund, in case state revenues continue to tumble. Members of the governor’s own party want to spend some of that money now for a variety of projects and causes.

“I’m glad I’ve got ‘em broke in,” Schweitzer said of the Republicans. “I had to veto 19 bills to get my ending fund balance at the end of the last legislative session.”

Peterson and Story said a keeping a reserve at the end of the session makes sense because the economy is still struggling.

“That’s just good business,” Peterson said. “That’s calling a spade a spade.”

Budget and stimulus bills are bound for House-Senate conference committees, whose members are charged with seeking compromises. Story and Peterson predicted reasonable outcomes.

“I think in the end the governor hopefully will be pleased with it,” Peterson said.